The submission describes a technical consultancy ('Atelier Janin') but lacks verifiable evidence to support its claims. While the description implies professional services in health-tech and fintech, the metadata contains significant red flags: the claim that 'most people have used my product' is unsubstantiated for a boutique consultancy, and the revenue metric ('marketcap') is misapplied. The domain appears valid but has no significant search footprint. The submission is penalized heavily for vague claims and lack of proof.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline