The project 'Async' exists as a legitimate asynchronous voice messaging platform (async.com) with a high-value domain and a verifiable product. However, the submission itself is of extremely poor quality, containing hyperbolic and demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone'). While the tool addresses a valid problem (meeting fatigue) with relevant market timing, the lack of verifiable metrics, the presence of red flags in the traction claims, and the lazy input data result in a low score consistent with the 'Minimal traction or red flags' calibration.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline