The submission represents a solo business strategy consultancy rather than a scalable technology project. The input data contains significant red flags, most notably the hyperbolic claim that 'most people have used my product,' which severely undermines credibility. There is no evidence of technical innovation, revenue, or verifiable user base. The project scores extremely low due to lack of proof, unrealistic claims, and the absence of a technological component.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline