The submission represents 'Craft Worldwide' (craftww.com), a major global production agency with significant real-world utility and high-tier clientele (Google, Microsoft, L'Oréal). However, the submission quality is extremely poor, featuring a disconnected project name ('LunarKeeper'), vague descriptions, and hyperbolic claims ('everyone', 'most people have used my product'). While the underlying business entity is established and high-value (Launch 1979), the confusing and low-effort data provided severely impacts the confidence and quality scoring, pulling the final evaluation down to the level of a comparable established brand rather than a dominantly high score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline