The submission appears to be spam or a low-effort test entry. The project description refers to a legitimate industrial software partner (BluESP/AspenTech), but the metadata provided is factually incorrect (listing 'Retail' as the technology, claiming 'everyone' as the audience, and asserting 'most people have used my product'). The revenue figure is ambiguous and likely inaccurate. Due to these red flags and the lack of verifiable information, the score is minimal.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline