The submission represents a personal professional portfolio rather than a scalable technology project. While the subject appears to be an experienced IoT consultant, the submission lacks verifiable evidence of product utility, traction, or technical innovation. Claims such as audience reach including 'everyone' and traction where 'most people have used my product' are hyperbolic and unsupported by data. The technical description is non-existent ('Internet'), and financial metrics are misused ('marketcap' for a personal entity), resulting in a minimal score due to low response quality and lack of concrete proof.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline