The submission presents a significant discrepancy between the URL (Ascendus.org, a legitimate non-profit lender) and the description (Executive Coaching). While the organization itself is established (founded 1991) and has substantial assets (~$75M, verified externally), the submission quality is extremely low, featuring hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product') and mislabeled metrics. The score acknowledges the verified real-world utility of the entity while heavily penalizing the lack of coherent evidence and poor submission integrity.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline