The project 'Asana' is a verified, market-leading work management platform with massive real-world utility, strong traction (public company, ~$3B market cap), and global reach. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality (vague claims, lazy descriptions like 'everyone', and lack of specific technical detail). While the project's intrinsic value is high (pushing the score into the 400s), the 'Proof' provided in this specific submission is weak, preventing a higher score typical of enterprise-grade software (600+). The score reflects the reality of the business adjusted significantly downward for the poor quality of the application materials.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline