The submission contains significant red flags, including verifiable falsehoods (e.g., 'launch date 1979' for an NFT project, 'most people have used my product'). While 'Artpool' appears to be a real but niche NFT curation concept, the input data provided is low-quality, exaggerated, and lacks credible evidence of traction or technology. The project appears dormant or clearly misrepresented in this specific application.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline