The submission describes a standard service-based chess coaching business rather than a technology project. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is hyperbolic and verifiable false, resulting in a near-zero traction score. There is no evidence of custom technical innovation, scalable reach, or verifiable revenue. The project falls into the 'Minimal/No Traction' category with significant red flags in the submission data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline