The project is a standard local web design agency, but the submission suffers critically from low credibility and exaggerated claims. Stating 'most people have used my product' and an audience of 'everyone' for a Minnesota-based agency undermines trust. The description lacks specific technical details ('Computer Software'), and the 'marketcap' revenue figure is ambiguous. While the underlying service has theoretical utility, the 'Proof' provided is insufficient and poor in quality, resulting in a minimal score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline