The submission represents 'Archive.com' (a successful Series B resale platform) but is riddled with critical errors and hallucinations. The user conflates the resale company with an influencer marketing platform and, inexplicably, 'space technology' (likely confusing it with NASA Data Archives). While the actual entity has high traction ($54M+ funding), the submission's claims of 'everyone' using the product and irrelevant tags result in maximum penalties for quality and accuracy. The score reflects a high-potential company presented via a failing, incoherent submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline