The submission references 'Aquent', a legitimate and massive global staffing agency established in 1986 with significant revenue ($600M+). However, the submission quality is extremely poor, containing hyperbolic and unverifiable claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'everyone'). While the entity's real-world scale warrants high base scores for Traction and Reach, the Quality Factor (0.5x) significantly penalizes the score due to the lack of specific evidence and the 'spam-like' nature of the response (e.g., nonsense market cap figures). The final score reflects a large, established business weighed down by a low-effort submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline