The project represents a standard software development agency (AppAvengers) with a reported team of 11-20. However, the submission quality is critically low, characterized by hyperbolic and unverifiable traction claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product') and vague audience definitions ('everyone'). While the business appears to have existed since 2016, the lack of concrete revenue data, verifiable case studies, or specific technical differentiators results in a low score consistent with minimal verifiable traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline