The submission appears to be a placeholder or low-effort entry with significant red flags. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a specialized event summit company, and the input data lacks specific details, verifiable metrics, or technological substance. The revenue figure is ambiguous ('marketcap' vs revenue) and likely low if in local currency (HUF). The project scores near zero due to lack of credible evidence and poor response quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline