The submission describes a traditional migration consultancy ('Law Practice') rather than a technology project. While the core service has valid real-world utility for its specific niche, the submission is critically undermined by exaggerated and unrealistic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', audience 'everyone'). The team size of 30 suggests an operating SME, but the lack of technical innovation and the low-quality response result in a low Proof of Usefulness score compared to scalable technology ventures.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline