The project refers to a legitimate and established Brazilian academic association (ANPEd), which provides a baseline level of real-world utility. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, likely created by an unrelated party or bot ('ShadowShade'). It contains demonstrably false claims ('everyone', 'most people'), nonsensical financial metrics ('marketcap: 500000'), and lacks any verifiable evidence of digital traction or innovation. The score is heavily penalized for response quality and lack of proof, placing it in the 'Minimal Traction' tier despite the organization's offline legitimacy.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline