This submission for Anaplan receives a low score due to extremely poor data quality, despite representing a market-leading enterprise platform. The submission contains grossly inaccurate financial figures (citing a ~$17M market cap versus the actual historical ~$10B+ valuation), false audience claims ('everyone', 'most people have used my product'), and generic descriptions. While the evaluator recognizes the real-world utility and scale of Anaplan, the Proof of Usefulness methodology penalizes unsupported, vague, and erroneous submissions. The score reflects the failure of the submission to accurately demonstrate the project's value.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline