The submission for 'Amynos' (DeepKeeper) suffers from significant credibility issues, primarily the claim that 'most people have used my product', which is factually impossible for a specialized B2B consulting firm of this size. While the underlying business (Life Sciences Consulting) has theoretical utility, the project description is vague, the audience targeting ('everyone') is unrealistic, and the submission lacks verifiable traction or technological innovation details. The revenue metric is unstructured and confusing ('all time marketcap'). Consequently, the project scores in the lowest tier due to red flags and lack of evidence.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline