Proof of Usefulness Report

Amynos

Analysis completed on 2/26/2026

+15
Proof of Usefulness Score
You're In Business

The submission for 'Amynos' (DeepKeeper) suffers from significant credibility issues, primarily the claim that 'most people have used my product', which is factually impossible for a specialized B2B consulting firm of this size. While the underlying business (Life Sciences Consulting) has theoretical utility, the project description is vague, the audience targeting ('everyone') is unrealistic, and the submission lacks verifiable traction or technological innovation details. The revenue metric is unstructured and confusing ('all time marketcap'). Consequently, the project scores in the lowest tier due to red flags and lack of evidence.

Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?

Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes

View All Reports

Score Breakdown

Real World Utility+6.25
Audience Reach Impact+1.00
Technical Innovation+3.00
Evidence Of Traction+0.63
Market Timing Relevance+2.50
Functional Completeness+0.25
Subtotal+13.63
Usefulness Multiplierx1.1
Final Score+15

Project Details

Project URL
Description
Consulting in Health and Compliance - Lifescience e-health, IoT, Market access, regulatory matter, Clinical Trials Lobbying at French and European level

Algorithm Insights

Market Position
Growing utility with room for optimization
User Engagement
Documented reach suggests active user community
Technical Stack
Modern tech stack aligned with sponsor technologies

Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score

Document User Growth

Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates

Showcase Revenue Model

Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams

Expand Evidence Base

Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation

Technical Roadmap

Share development milestones and feature completion timeline