The submission for 'Amarji' presents significant credibility issues. While a UK-based entity by this name exists (incorporated 2020), the claim that 'most people have used my product' is factually impossible for a niche data consultancy. The input fields contain vague, hyperbolic, and non-technical responses (e.g., listing 'Management Consulting' as the technology). The revenue figure uses 'marketcap' incorrectly. The project appears to be a standard small agency or a low-quality submission, lacking verifiable evidence of the massive scale claimed.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline