The submission represents a traditional legal service firm rather than a technology project, resulting in a low innovation score. While the firm appears to be an established entity with a significant claimed team size, the submission suffers from hyperbolic and unverifiable claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', audience is 'everyone'). The financial metric provided ('marketcap') is terminologically incorrect for a private service firm, further reducing credibility. The project lacks the technical implementation required for a high Proof of Usefulness score in this context.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline