The project appears to be a small, boutique cybersecurity consultancy based in Australia with a focus on maritime security. However, the submission quality is critically low, containing demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', audience is 'everyone') and inconsistent data (Project Name 'ThunderStorm' vs Description 'Alvera'). While the core service offering (pen-testing, security review) has inherent utility, the lack of verifiable traction, low-effort submission, and confusion regarding the project identity result in a very low Proof of Usefulness score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline