The submission describes the University of Bologna (a highly reputable institution) but fails as a technology project proposal. The data provided includes nonsensical claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'marketcap: 1000000001'), a likely incorrect launch date for the project scope (2015 vs 1088), and lacks specific technical details. The submission appears to be a low-effort or test entry by a student ('WhisperFang') rather than a serious Proof of Usefulness assessment.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline