The submission conflates two distinct entities: 'Allbridge.io' (a legitimate blockchain bridge launched ~2021) and 'Allbridge.com' (a hospitality technology firm founded ~2004). While the provided URL points to the crypto project, the launch date (2004), team size (158-201), and description details appear copied from the hospitality company. Additionally, the traction claim ('most people have used my product') is factually incorrect. Although Allbridge.io has processed over $1 billion in volume, its active user base is niche (~1.8K monthly). The score reflects the high utility of the actual crypto protocol, heavily penalized by the confused data and hyperbolic claims in the submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline