The submission describes a standard recruitment agency rather than a technology product. The claims regarding traction ('most people have used my product') are hyperbolic and unverifiable. The financial metric ('marketcap') is misused, likely referring to cumulative revenue over 9 years, indicating a very small-scale operation. There is no evidence of technical innovation or custom technology, resulting in a low score suitable for a non-technical service business submitted to a tech evaluation framework.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline