The submission represents a department within a legitimate educational institution (Dr. AITH) but suffers critically from poor data quality and hyperbolic claims. Assertions such as 'most people have used my product' and an audience of 'everyone' are verifiably false and damage credibility. The use of 'marketcap' for a university placement cell indicates a misunderstanding of metrics. While the underlying institution provides real-world utility to its students, the submission fails to demonstrate the specific traction, innovation, or scale required for a meaningful score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline