The submission represents a long-standing agricultural consultancy (founded 1997), suggesting legitimate local business operations. However, the submission quality is extremely poor, containing verifiable falsehoods (e.g., claiming 'most people have used my product' and 'everyone' as the audience) and nonsensical financial data. These red flags severely diminish the credibility of the project within this evaluation framework, resulting in a negligible score despite the likely existence of the underlying business.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline