The submission represents a legitimate New Zealand regulatory body (ASA), but the application data contains significant red flags suggesting it is not a serious or official entry. The submitter alias ('LunarKeeper'), nonsensical financial metrics ('marketcap: 50000' for a non-profit), and vague traction claims ('most people') severely degrade the score. While the organization itself has national utility, the submission fails to demonstrate the specific technical value or product metrics required by the PoU framework.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline