The project submission lacks credibility due to exaggerated claims ('most people have used my product') and nonsensical data inputs ('all time marketcap: null'). There is no verifiable digital footprint for the consultancy, and the response quality suggests a lack of serious engagement with the evaluation process. As a 2-person consultancy with no defined audience or custom technology, it falls into the lowest tier of traction and utility evidence.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline