The submission represents a local web design service ('ADesignGuy') with a generic description and questionable data accuracy. The claim that 'most people have used my product' and 'everyone' is the audience indicates either a lack of seriousness or a placeholder submission. The revenue figure ('marketcap: 500000') is mislabeled and unverifiable. While the underlying business type has standard utility, the low-quality response, lack of verifiable traction, and hyperbolic claims result in a negligible Proof of Usefulness score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline