The submission presents significant contradictions, notably a URL for a medical clinic paired with a description for a separate athlete agency. The traction claim ('most people have used my product') is objectively false and indicative of low-quality or spam input. Additionally, the revenue field uses non-standard metrics ('marketcap'), and technical fields lack actual technology details. While the underlying business entities may exist, the submission fails to provide verifiable or coherent evidence of utility or traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline