The submission represents a local disability support service (NDIS provider) rather than a technology project. The project name 'Acme Support Services' and claims such as 'most people have used my product' suggest either a placeholder entry or a misunderstanding of the platform's scope. There is no technical innovation, software stack, or verifiable digital traction. While the service mission is socially useful, the submission lacks the scalability, technology, and credible metrics required for a higher Proof of Usefulness score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline