The submission represents a standard digital marketing agency service but suffers significantly from low-quality data and unrealistic claims. The stated technology ('Internet'), audience reach ('everyone'), and traction ('most people have used my product') indicate a lack of seriousness or understanding of the evaluation context. Financial metrics ($50k all-time revenue vs. 125 team members) are mathematically inconsistent, suggesting data inaccuracy. There is no proprietary technology or verified evidence of market penetration to justify a higher score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline