The project appears to be a local engineering consultancy in Perth, but the submission is severely compromised by hyperbolic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product') and confusing financial terminology ('marketcap' instead of revenue). While the service likely holds local utility, the lack of verifiable evidence, the claim of global reach for a small firm, and the poor quality of the response result in a low score. The submission fails to demonstrate the traction or professional rigor expected of a business with the claimed valuation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline