The project represents a standard service-based marketing agency rather than a scalable technology product. The submission suffers from significant quality issues, including spelling errors ('Stratergy', 'Exibition') and unverifiable, exaggerated claims ('most people have used my product', audience is 'everyone'). With no specific metrics on revenue, team size, or user base, and no technological innovation presented, the score reflects a lack of verifiable traction and low submission effort relative to the benchmark.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline