The submission suffers from extreme hyperbole and a lack of verifiable data. Claims such as 'everyone' for audience and 'most people have used my product' are unrealistic for a 6-person agency with no cited case studies or recognizable product names. The financial metric is confused ('all time marketcap' listed under monthly revenue), and the description lists generic service categories without proof of execution. While the agency may exist, the quality of the submission and lack of evidence result in a minimal score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline